1. As to real estate listed in the separate sheet:

A. A donation contract concluded on December 4, 2013 between the Defendant and B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) against the Plaintiff Company B was transferred several times, and the Plaintiff finally transferred the credit card usage claim against the Plaintiff on June 12, 2014. Around that time, the Plaintiff sent the notice of transfer to B. (2) The Plaintiff filed an application with the Seoul Eastern District Court for a payment order against B under the Seoul Eastern District Court 2014Guide40286, and issued a payment order on September 11, 2014, stating that “B would pay to the Plaintiff delay damages for KRW 2,00,000 among KRW 6,32,722 and this amount,” and the said payment order became final and conclusive on October 31, 2014.

B. The gift contract and registration 1) B between B and the Defendant shall be the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

A) On September 16, 1996, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on September 24, 2013 with respect to the instant real estate on the ground of inheritance. 2) The Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer (hereinafter “instant registration”) on the ground of the donation from December 4, 2013 (hereinafter “instant donation”) on December 5, 2013.

C. B was insolvent at the time of the instant donation.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s claim against B prior to the existence of the preserved claim is the preserved claim seeking the revocation of the gift contract of this case.

3. The establishment of a fraudulent act and the intention of doing so;

A. The gist of the parties’ assertion argues that the instant gift agreement constitutes a fraudulent act, since the Plaintiff, while B was insolvent, donated the instant real estate to the Defendant without compensation.

The defendant asserts that, as follows, the defendant asserts it.

When the procedure for compulsory auction of the real estate in this case was initiated by the Gwangju District Court Ycheon Branch C, the defendant, on October 30, 2013, had D, who was living together, subrogated the amount of KRW 20 million equivalent to the shares in B, and had the applicant for auction withdraw the application for auction.