logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원의성지원 2016.10.26 2016가단10355
손해배상(자)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally committed against Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 284,137,60, and KRW 5,000,000 and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 18, 2015, Defendant C driven D4.5 tons car trucks (hereinafter “Defendant’s side”) around 18:05, while driving the national highway No. 28 in front of the 20th parallel, which is located in the interesting 60km in the Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, the speed limit of which is 60 km from the territorial bank of Yongcheon-si, the Defendant C was due to the negligence of driving the central line over 67 km in speed beyond the speed limit, while driving it along the central line on the opposite lane and returning it to its own lane, and received the front left side part of the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

In the instant accident, the F, who was driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “the deceased”), died from the show of blood transfusions, etc. on its job, and the Plaintiff A, who is the passenger of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, suffered injury, such as a closed diversification, which requires treatment for about six weeks.

C. The Plaintiff A is the mother of the Deceased’s property, who is the only heir of the deceased, the Plaintiff B is the decedent of the deceased, and the Defendant Mine Maga Co., Ltd is the operator of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant Korean Freight truck Association is the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1-5, 8, 9 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's descriptions or images, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition, Defendant C is liable to compensate the deceased and their bereaved families of the instant accident as an insurer for the damages incurred by the instant accident.

B. However, according to the above evidence, it is recognized that the deceased was in operation with the central line at the time of the instant accident, and such negligence of the deceased was caused by the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damage.

arrow