logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.21 2015고단2352
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

However, Defendant B and C.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, as a measure to withdraw telephone financial fraud, transmitted the physical cards, relevant passwords, account numbers, etc. collected by the telephone financial fraud assistance staff in China through Kwikset service. If the victims deposit money into the above account received by the Defendants, the Defendants deposited money through the cash payment machine, and wired money to the account in which the victims are directly sent in cash or are informed by the winners of name, and collected a certain amount of money from each time to be paid to E, etc.

1. Although Defendants A and B conspired to commit the joint principal offense, no one may keep the means of access for the purpose of using it for the purpose of committing the crime,

(a) around 14:00 on April 13, 2015, in front of the new banking station in Yeongdeungpocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu 959-7 foreign exchange bank, with a view to withdrawing the amount of damage deposited by the victims in telephone financial fraud, keep one copy of the new bank check (G) and one copy of the company bank check (I) in the name of the F delivered through Kwiksetman, for the purpose of withdrawing the amount of damage deposited by the victims in telephone financial fraud;

B. On April 14, 2015, around 09:30, at K, in the front of K in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan CityJ, one copy of the community credit cooperatives (M) and one physical credit card (N) in the same way as that of the preceding paragraph were kept.

2. On April 14, 2015, Defendant A, B, and C conspired that they should not keep the means of access for the purpose of using the means of access. However, at around 25, around April 11, 2015, Defendant A, B, and C kept in front of the P, located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan GovernmentO, one sheet of the name unclaimed Bank C, one sheet of the name-unclaimed Bank C, one sheet of Gyeongnam Bank C, and one sheet of Gyeongnam Bank C (S).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement regarding T;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1.Each photograph, set copy, investigation report (related to a suspect A remittance account), and

arrow