logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고정3153
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a taxi in Orusus.

On June 19, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 164 km from the Incheon Airport to the Seoul Airport at a speed of 3.6 km at 3.6 km in the New Airport Highway in Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu.

In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to safely drive the driver in accordance with the speed limit while properly examining the traffic conditions of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this, while driving at a speed exceeding 64 km per hour, found the victim C (year 56) driving a two-lane and changed the course to the right side in order to avoid this, the Defendant changed the course to the right side while changing the course to the next left side in order to avoid a collision with the non-motor vehicle driving the same direction, the Defendant shocked the right side part of the damaged vehicle into the front side of the left side of the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., by occupational negligence, to the victim for about three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Notification of traffic accident analysis results;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow