All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by misunderstanding the fact, despite the fact that the Defendant had ordered the victims of a traffic accident, and the Defendant did not have to take relief measures directly for the victims because the degree of injury inflicted by the victim was minor, and thus, the Defendant did not have intention to flee.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted by the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts, the following facts can be acknowledged as stated by the court below.

피해차량인 택시의 충격부위 사진에서 알 수 있듯이, 피해차량 뒷범퍼 중간 부위가 안쪽으로 움푹 패여 있는 것으로 보아 당시 충격의 정도가 컸으리라 예상된다.

After the accident, the victims took part of the defendant's name to the victims who are taxi articles and passengers, but they stated that the taxi passengers were 119 passengers or police officers, and that they returned the name that the defendant served as a taxi engineer F, and that they left the taxi site without the victims and the victims.

The victims have been unable to memory the number of the defendant's vehicle at the time of the wind that the defendant left the scene rapidly.

The Defendant was off from the scene of the accident without taking any particular measures as to the degree of one hour from the new wall, and thereafter, the Defendant did not receive a long time from the police officer or the victims, and did not receive the victims’ personal information or vehicle number, and did not receive the insurance accident properly.

The victims suffered injury that requires two or three weeks of treatment, and it is difficult to view such injury as a minor degree that there is no need to take relief measures.

2.2