logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.01.15 2014고단2800
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 2800"

1. At around 00:30 on August 23, 2014, the Defendant driven a Crophio vehicle while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.187%, without obtaining a driver’s license in a section of about 5km from the 3rd-ro Seoul Jongnoro to the unification of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul to the roads in front of the age of 665 years from the 3rd-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul to the unification of Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul.

2. On August 23, 2014, at around 00:30, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act: (a) driven a Crodi license car, and then, (b) driven the road in front of the age of 665 years in front of the Seoul Eunpyeong-gu Denmark hospital at a speed of 665 lanes from the green translation direction at a non-wide area to the green translation direction; (c) caused the negligence of driving a bus bus stop and the driver’s license plate installed on the left side of the Defendant’s driving direction to damage the repair cost amounting to approximately KRW 415,00 on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

3. On August 23, 2014, the Defendant violated the Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) around 00:30, the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-ro 3 operated the said Rodice Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods Rods Ma not covered by mandatory insurance from the road of accident to the unification of Eunpyeong-gu, the point of accident to the point

The defendant of "2014 Highest 3057" is a person who is engaged in driving a Crodi license car.

On August 22, 2014, at around 23:47, the Defendant, at the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, proceeded at about 137 km, from the right side of the Gyeongdog Gindog, at about 35 km each hour, along the two lanes between the 3-lane and the 3-lane.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a driver who is engaged in driving service by living well on the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, the defendant is negligent in driving a vehicle on the three-lane road due to negligence and thereby taking the left part of the D bus, which is owned by the injured passenger.

arrow