Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a Cknife vehicle.

On March 22, 2017, around 09:06, the Defendant proceeded two lanes in the direction of Mapo-gu Office in the direction of Mapo-gu Office in Seoul, Seoul.

In such cases, despite the fact that a vehicle that stops or stops in order to prevent the danger, the defendant, while proceeding into a two-lane, has carried the vehicle in order to prevent the danger of the accident in a three-lane.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A photograph of a minated video;

1. A reporter's blackbbox and video CD;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the criminal place

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 156 subparag. 3, 23 and 22 subparag. 2 subparag. 3 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing the Costs of Trial (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act is a lawful change of career, but according to the evidence, the defendant's act is deemed as a lawful change of course, but the defendant's act is likely to cause danger if he moves into a three-lane way to enter the front line of the defendant, and it is recognized that the defendant's act, who driven at a normal speed from the second lane to the third lane, has entered the third lane. Thus, the defendant's act constitutes an act of overtaking a vehicle that stops or is going to stop in order to prevent danger.

Therefore, the above assertion shall not be accepted.