The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and six months) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant agreed with the victims, that the defendant should consider equality with the case where he was tried simultaneously with the crime of violation of the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and Protection, etc. of Victims Act (special rape). However, these circumstances appears to have been considered all at the court below, and there was no change in circumstances at the court below. Meanwhile, each of the crimes of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant during a limited term of not less than 3 years since the defendant's crime of this case was committed with the victim C due to a view to the view of the crime and the degree of damage, etc. in light of the type of crime and the degree of injury, etc., the crime is not less than less than 8 weeks, and the defendant committed the crime of this case without care during the period of repeated crime of larceny, etc., and the defendant's punishment of this case is too inevitable during a limited term of not less than 3 years, and the defendant's motive and circumstance leading up to the crime of this case's maximum punishment, etc., and there are no extenuating circumstances that the defendant's punishment of this case's punishment.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.