1. The Defendant is the executory order of the case No. 2016 tea12686 against Nonparty D in Busan District Court.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the defendant executed seizure of corporeal movables listed in the attachment list (hereinafter "instant articles") in Busan Gangseo-gu and Fdong gambling plant on November 27, 2018 with the executory exemplification of the payment order of the case No. 2016 tea No. 2686 against non-party D as executive title. D bears 75 million won as to the plaintiff, but on December 20, 2015, it was recognized that the plaintiff paid the user fee to the plaintiff and agreed to continue to use the above manufacturing machine No. 20788 with the plaintiff on November 27, 2018.

According to the above facts, the article of this case is owned by the plaintiff, and the execution of this case against the article of this case by the defendant is illegal as against the article of this case owned by another person and is not permitted.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.