The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant, as indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, did not have any fact that there was a net or indirect arrival of the victim’s vehicle; (b) the lower court convicted the Defendant on the premise of such

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. ① It is hard to see the possibility that the defendant had a net indirect landing at a place other than the defendant's driving, in light of the location of the defendant's vehicle and the direction of its progress, and ③ it is hard to see that the defendant's direct landing at a place other than the defendant's driving prior to the occurrence of the instant case, starting with stopping, and continuously applied for the instant crime in light of the fact that the defendant was living with the victim, and there is sufficient motive for the defendant to attempt the instant crime. ② The defendant's vehicle with the windows of the chief (which did not sit at any place) was in the front of the instant case, and the vehicle was in the front of the instant case, and it was hard to see that the defendant had a net indirect landing at a place other than the defendant's driving, and ③ it is hard to see that the defendant had a net indirect landing at a place other than the defendant's driving, and the defendant's vehicle's vehicle's location cannot be determined to have any error in the judgment.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.