The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who, around May 24, 2013, establishes and operates Ulsan-gu C and two floors as its principal office, Kwikset Co., Ltd., the main purpose of which is to provide Kwikset service.

From July 28, 2006, the victim E operated Kwikset Service Company with the trade name “F” at work in Ulsan City. For seven years, the above Company used the “G” at a very high level of recognition through the advertisement attached to a taxi operated at one of the day in Ulsan City, Ulsan City, and the publicity using a website website, and operated the off-to-land where the employees suffered from the wave flaps indicated in the “D Company G” used the off-to-land flaps in which the freight partitions recorded in “D Company G” were installed.

From May 24, 2013, the Defendant committed an unfair competition act that causes confusion with the victim's business activities by using "H" in the above D office and using "C, telephone number," and causing employees suffering from yellow flaps to use dynasium installed with "B," which is similar to the victim's trade name widely known in the Republic of Korea.

2. 판단 살피건대, 부정경쟁방지법 제2조 제1호 ㈏목 소정의 부정경쟁행위는 사실상 국내에 널리 인식된 타인의 성명, 상호, 표장 그밖에 타인의 영업임을 표시하는 표지(이하 ‘영업표지’라 한다)와 동일하거나 이와 유사한 것을 사용하여 타인의 영업상의 시설 또는 활동과 혼동하게 하는 행위를 의미하는바, 타인의 영업표지가 국내에 널리 인식되었는지 여부는 그 사용기간, 방법, 태양, 사용량, 영업범위 등과 그 영업의 실정 및 사회통념상 객관적으로 널리 알려졌느냐의 여부가 기준이 되는데, 식별력이 없거나 미약한 것으로 보이는 문자나 숫자의 결합으로 이루어진 영업표지가 사용된 결과...