logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.25 2016고합107
준강도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

One Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, was pressured in 2016.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2016, 107"

1. A quasi-Robbery Defendant: (a) around 03:45 on January 24, 2016, around 03:45, and around the underground shopping district located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, the Defendant stolen the paper bags owned by E, which contain any essential living things in the market price, such as brushes, brushes, etc., left the floor of the underground shopping district, by using a cresh in which the paper bags owned by E, which contain any essential living things in the market price, was neglected; and (b) caused the theft of E in the play.

At this time, the victim F (the age of 26) prevented the defendant, and the defendant was faced with the above paper door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door from the victim F, and the defendant continued to gather waste door door door door door door around the entrance door door door door door door door door door door from the victim F, and led to the victim F.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted and threatened the victim F with the aim of evading arrest.

"2016, 452"

2. On January 7, 2016, at around 22:35, the Defendant: (a) laid down the bricks of the victim I (n, age 25), a tourist of Chinese nationality, on the road located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and assaulted the victim by cutting down the back of the victim’s head on one occasion, without any justifiable reason, following the back of the victim I (n, age 25) who is a tourist of Chinese nationality.

"2016, 458"

3. At around 15:40 on February 22, 2016, the Defendant stolen a thief by taking advantage of the fact that the victim K (n, S, S, 70 years old), who is visually impaired, set up on the floor and laid down on the floor in order to be able to walk, approximately KRW 2,000,000, which was contained in the misunderstanding, did not see the victim’s front.

4. The Defendant, at the time, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 3, knew of the fact that the victim was unable to duplicate by rhing the victim’s rupture while leaving the victim’s rupture and rupture, he duptures the victim’s spath with his own hand and supbling the bal.

arrow