1. The Defendant’s KRW 619,020,000 among the Plaintiff and KRW 300,000,000 from June 10, 2014, and KRW 319,020,000.

Facts of recognition

Dexure 13, 100-200, and 450-750, and 100. 0.00. 0. 0. 00. 7, 100. 750. 100. 3. 1,000. 1,00. 1,000. 1,00. 3. 1,000,000. 3. 1,000,000,000. 1,000,000. 3. 1,00,000,000,000. 3. 1,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000. 1,00. 3. 3. 1, 201,01,000. 3. 1,0. 3. 3. 3. 3.

(2) Since February 14, 2013,

8. From May to May, the Defendant purchased the primary film of Defendant production in total of KRW 166,916,288, and paid KRW 106,358,868 to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff produced the PE (POethyle ethal rate film (hereinafter referred to as "the second film") on one side of the PE (PET) film in order to protect the HE-rating side, and on the other side, contact with the first film (if it is not completely connected with the first film, it is not completely connected with the first film, but can be removed).

From April 5, 2013 to July 2013, the Plaintiff exported the second film of USD 1,574,852.10 (US dollars; hereinafter the same shall apply) to China’s “A” (hereinafter “A”).

A, around August 2013, notified the Plaintiff that there was a defect in the second film exported by the Plaintiff. On September 16, 2013, A sent a written request for compensation for defective products caused by the second film exported by the Plaintiff. At the time, A sent to the Plaintiff a written request for compensation for defective products, “A performs a direct cause analysis through a quality department’s on-site investigation and a customer’s on-site investigation.