A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2016, around 22:35, the Defendant was on the front day of the “C” main station located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and received a report from the Defendant that the Defendant was living together, and the police officer F of the Seo-gu Police Station E box belonging to the Seo-gu, Gwangju who was called out after receiving the report from D, and received the case from D, and the Defendant “Nice reported.”

F, “F,” with sound and froding, she saw F as “I am flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish flish

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. Application of the 112 Report Handling List, the E police box photographic document, and the Acts and subordinate statutes governing garbage boomics;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [The grounds for sentencing which are favorable among the reasons for sentencing] [the scope of recommendation] that interferes with the performance of official duties, and the basic area (from June to January 4) of the Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the decision of sentence] is against the defendant's wrongness. The motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, the contents and degree of the act obstructing the performance of official duties, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the past criminal records, the defendant's age, sexual behavior, family relationship, economic circumstances, etc. are comprehensively considered, and the punishment is determined as ordered.