logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.04.26 2015가단5131
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 10,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 12, 2014 to April 26, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant D is a assistant nurse who works in Gsan F in the original city, and Defendant E is the president of the above father and the above father.

The plaintiff is a person born from H’s father and child.

B. Defendant D, around 05:00 on November 12, 2014, failed to verify in advance the position of the person who was seated after the Plaintiff in the said father’s and the newborn baby room, and caused the Plaintiff’s head to face on the left knee-hand side of Defendant D, while going beyond, caused the Plaintiff’s head to fall.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). C.

After the instant accident, Defendant D reported the Plaintiff’s head to Defendant E. The Plaintiff’s head was sent to the Defendant, and on November 12, 2014, the Plaintiff was sent to the Plaintiff to the original Symanian Hospital on November 12, 2014, and the next day was sent to the Symanian Hospital.

The Plaintiff received medical treatment by suffering injuries, such as salivous, traumatic, and composite part of the accident in the instant case.

On December 7, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a 6th degree of brain disease.

[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6 through 9, 11 through 13 (if any, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the result of the examination of medical records on the president of the Korean Medical Association of the Court, the result of the examination of each fact to the National Pension Service of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts found above, Defendant D has the duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident by supervising and supervising Defendant D, an assistant nurse, as the mother father and the head of the child, and thus, the Defendants breached the above duty of care to prevent the occurrence of the accident. Thus, Defendant D violated the above duty of care.

arrow