Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 5, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 300,000,000 as a fine for larceny at the Seoul Central District Court; on February 5, 2007, a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as a fine for the same crime at the Seoul Northern District Court; on June 5, 2009, a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for the same crime at the Seoul East East East District Court; on March 10, 201, a summary order of KRW 1 million as a fine for the same crime at the Sungnam Branch Branch Branch of the Suwon District Court.

On July 20, 2014, at around 08:05, the Defendant stolen a 800,000 won of the market value of the victim’s G located beside the victim’s G located adjacent to the “F soup” room located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

In addition, from around that time to September 15, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen five cell phoness over five times, as indicated in the annexed crime sight table (1).

2. On March 23, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for six months by imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on March 23, 2006; on January 4, 201, the Incheon Central District Court issued a summary order of three million won by the same crime; on December 2, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won by the same crime at the Seoul Central District Court on December 2, 201; on September 6, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced the Defendant to a suspended sentence of four months by imprisonment without prison labor for the crime of acquisition of stolen property by occupational negligence; on August 13, 2014, the same kind of power as well as a fine of six million won by the Seoul East Central District Court on August 13, 2014 is more than three times.

On December 2, 2011, the Defendant acquired stolen goods after being aware of the fact that a gallonU, which was stolen by a person without a name at a gallon sales store operated by the Defendant in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, was a stolen goods.

By September 19, 2014, the Defendant acquired stolen goods habitually over 14 times, as shown in the list of crimes (2) in attached Form 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's office against the Defendants.