The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a former member of B, and D, the head of the department of C, around April 17, 2015, in relation to the pregnancy of E, a female employee, during the dialogue between the welfare center employee and the female employee, the Defendant was a member of the welfare center contract who was a member of E, who was a party to the case where E, related to the sexual discriminative speech, had been aware of the case, and the case was completed.

As F is no longer a re-contract, the victim G who was the president of F was not the president of F while making efforts to restore F to F, was dissatisfied with the failure of F to undermine the re-contract with F.

1. On March 17, 2016, the Defendant publicly insulting the complainant by entering F’s writing “H” into F’s Facebook north of the Republic of Korea on March 17, 2016;

2. 피고인은 2016. 4. 28. 경 I가 J에 위와 같은 C 사건에 대해 쓴 글을 읽고 이에 대한 반박 글을 게시하기로 마음먹고, 2016. 5. 28. 17:48 경 자신의 페이스 북에 “K” 라는 제목 하에 “ I는 그래서 G의 살아온 이력과 인품으로 보아 인권침해를 할 만한 사람이 아니라 했다, 나는 G을 모른다 다만 이번 사건을 대하는 G의 모습을 보고 그에게 인품이란 단어가 과연 어울릴까 고개를 갸우뚱 하게 된다, 아니 절래

e.g. Does

scambing

G was due to the comments of bad gue.

There is no common sense that G is a bad character but a bad character owner. G is considered to be dead and bad.

In addition, due to the possibility of filing a complaint, the victim was openly insulting by posting a letter “influence” to “confluence”.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. G’s statement protocol (Evidence 34 pages of evidence records) at the police on June 23, 2016;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning filing of a complaint and issues;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.