1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by C.

1. On July 15, 1974, with respect to the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of F on May 25, 1995, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of G [the ground for recognition] pursuant to the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992; invalidation], the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of H on August 18, 1999; the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the Defendant (the ground for registration of ownership in the name of H on August 18, 1999; the ground for registration of ownership transfer in the name of H on August 17, 199; the ground for registration of ownership transfer in the name of H on March 13, 199; and the ownership transfer in the name of H on March 24, 200; and the ownership transfer registration in the name of H on March 29, 2004>

On June 1, 1960 with respect to the portion of 450/853 square meters, E-si, E-si, 2820 square meters, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of J on June 1, 1960, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of F on July 15, 1974, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of F on June 21, 1995 with respect to the portion of F 403/853 square meters on June 21, 1995, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of G on October 15, 1981 (the reason for the sale as of October 15, 1992, Act No. 4502, Nov. 30, 1992), the registration of ownership transfer in the name of H on November 26, 1998 (the sale and purchase on November 12, 199), and the reason for ownership transfer in the name of H on March 24, 20094.

2. 이 사건 소의 적법여부에 관한 판단 주장요지 : ▷원고는, 이 사건 토지가 L 14세손 M 후손 중 만 25세 이상 된 자로서 주로 순천시 일대에 거주하는 자들로 구성된 원고의 소유인데, 별지 기재와 같이 부동산 명의를 신탁하여 관리하고 있고, 이 사건 소장 송달로 명의신탁을 해지하므로 피고는 원고에게 이 사건 부동산에 관한 소유권이전등기절차를 이행할 의무가 있다고 주장한다.

▷이에 대하여 피고는 원고가 종중의 실체를 갖추지 못했고, 그렇지 않더라도 "회장은 정기총회시 회원 30명 이상, 임시총회시 회원 20명 이상에게 공고,...