beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.
In 2015, one head of the corporate bank, one head of the Dong-gu District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Justice] On October 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on October 28, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
On July 2015, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a “D” person who is a member of the telephone financial fraud organization to “D,” and anticipated that a part of the amount to be deposited in the party’s account will be paid to the sender at the time of delivery to the party; (b) was related to the crime, such as scaming, etc.; and (c) accepted it; (d) sent a copy of the corporate bank (E) and a copy of the identification card in the name of the Defendant on August 2015, 2015, by facsimile.
1. On August 18, 2015, at around 11:00 on August 18, 2015, the name influor of a telephone financial fraud organization for the crime committed with the victim H assumes the prosecution investigator to the victim H (n, 28 years of age). The phone call read “influoring the account number and password, etc. by accessing the site of the prosecutor’s office where the personal name was stolen and then accessing the site of the prosecutor’s office during the investigation”, and the victim knew of electronic financial transaction information, such as the victim’s account number and password.
Since then, telephone financial fraud assistance officers had access to the Internet banking site of Gyeongnam bank and entered the password, transfer password, etc. of the victim's account identified as above without authority, and transferred KRW 24,000,000 from the Gyeongnam bank account (I) in the name of the victim to the company bank account (E) in the name of the defendant, and the defendant knew that the money deposited in his own account was the damage amount of the crime of typing, and issued the money to the officer in the name of the victim (J) with the knowledge of the fact that the money deposited in his own account was the damage amount of the crime of typing.
As a result, the defendant inputs illegal orders or inputs information without authority to the data processing device such as a computer.