logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.04.20 2015고정3178
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 25, 2015, at around 16:40 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant, at the second head of Dong Dong Dong Dong Dong-gu Seoul Residents' Self-Governing Center, suffered bodily injury, such as light failure, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, to the victim E (the victim E, who was the head of Dong 58) who was the head of Dong Dong-gu, Dong Dong Dong-gu, Seoul Residents' Self-Governing Center, and caused the victim's bodily injury, such as light failure, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, G and H;

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to recording notes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion regarding the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act argues that the Defendant’s act does not constitute a legitimate defense, considering the following as a whole: (a) the Defendant’s head debt was taken in order to prevent the Defendant from keeping his/her head in mind; (b) however, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the ground that the Defendant’s act does not constitute a legitimate defense, given that the Defendant’s act does not constitute a legitimate defense, considering the following: (c) the background of fighting which the Defendant may know in accordance with the evidence in the judgment; (d) the Defendant’s head debt of the victim was shakinged (based on the recording of a recording document, the Defendant did not immediately keep the victim’s head debt even if he/she

arrow