logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.28 2015고정2325
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (after-accidents), while driving D A6-A-A-A-6 car on the front of the building in the Suwon-si flood Zone C on June 26, 2015, the front part of the said car, which was set up in the center line, was stopped.

The defendant did not immediately stop the above central separation zone so that the city repair costs can be destroyed by the market, but did not take necessary measures, and escaped in the direction of a neighboring U.S. apartment complex, which was lowered from a car without leaving the site.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of alcohol measurement) by the Defendant was discovered in the above-mentioned apartment complex by Embscing the police station belonging to the Seocho-gu Police Station and the patrolman F, the Defendant sent back to the emergency room of the Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-si Seoul-dong Hospital for treatment of the upper side of the snow on the right side, which was discovered in the above-mentioned apartment complex, around 112 at the time specified in paragraph (1).

After completion of emergency treatment, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, red, and light distance to the extent that it is difficult to walk normally, from the above E and F, at the front of the emergency parking lot of the above hospital.

Due to reasonable grounds to determine a person, it was demanded from around 03:15 to around 03:45 of the same day to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument over a period of about 30 minutes.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for measurement of drinking without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report, a circumstantial report on the driver at home, and a report on the detection of the driver at home;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions, Articles 148, 54(1) (a) of the Road Traffic Act, Articles 148-2(1)2 and 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, as well as the selection of fines for negligence;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, and Article 38.

arrow