Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a subway-based ship engineer, and Defendant B is a ship of Chinese nationality that entered the Republic of Korea on May 6, 2016 as a short-term visiting visa.

Defendant

A around May 25, 2016, from the name defective in the name of Bosing Organization (hereinafter “D”) known through the column for advertisement of the rice Luxembourg Market offer, A was instructed to deliver the cash bags containing the cash withdrawal from the said organization’s cash withdrawals to the cash collection books of the said organization, and was aware that the said organization was prevented from committing Bosing fraud, etc. on the same day, even though he/she was aware that the said organization was carrying out the three cash bags delivery business around May 26, 2016, he/she was aware of the fact that the said organization was committed against many unspecified persons, as a result of performing the three cash bags delivery business around May 26, 2016, he/she withdrawn the money deposited in the name defective in the name of the Defendant’s name from the said organization to deliver it to the cash delivery books of the said organization as Defendant B, and then notified the account number of the Defendant’s company bank account in the name of the said organization to the above name defecter.

In addition, on May 26, 2016, Defendant B, who became aware of the Internet job offer advertisement search, was offered a proposal that “if Defendant B plays a role of sending goods to Korea after obtaining goods from a person who delivered goods in Korea, Defendant B shall grant KRW 200,000 per case, 200,000 per case,” and accepted the proposal that Defendant B was committed against many and unspecified persons.

On the other hand, on May 24, 2016, the above person under whose name the lending was made by telephone from the victim F to the victim F. In order to meet the loan eligibility, there is no delay in arrears and the rating should be lowered. It is possible to convert the existing loans into a low interest rate if repayment is enforced.”

However, the above-mentioned person did not have the intention or ability to provide a loan for the victim.

The above-mentioned person who was named as the victim is the victim.