A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. in the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Branch Branch, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 26, 2013.

[2013 Highest 2361]

1. On June 29, 2013, from around 09:10 to 10:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s duties by force by avoiding disturbance, such as “a bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bit of bits

2. From June 29, 2013 to 17:00 on June 29, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s duties by force by avoiding disturbance, such as “hinging a sway with a sway, coffee, chewing, and 2 times,” and passing sound to the victim C at the place specified in paragraph (1).

[2013Kadan2556] From around 16:35 on July 3, 2013 to 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant expressed a desire to do so in the “Ddade” of the said victim C’s operation, and the employees expressed the Defendant out of the outside, humped the Defendant’s disease, humping the Defendant’s door, hump, and sound, etc., and interfered with the victim’s duties by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in a written statement;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. From among concurrent crimes, considering the facts and contents of each of the crimes of this case for sentencing reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes, the criminal defendant must be strictly punished in light of the fact that the criminal defendant had been punished several times due to violent crimes and has committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of it during the period of repeated crimes. However, the criminal defendant's mistake is divided, and at the hospital as well as the existence of depression and alcohol.