The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for four months and one year of suspended execution) of the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant led to confession and reflect on the instant crime, and returned the vehicle on February 3, 2015.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances, even if the lease contract was terminated and the return was demanded, the Defendant was operated without returning a vehicle for about two years, the Defendant did not agree with the victim, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant argument, such as the Defendant’s age, circumstances leading to the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, even though considering the aforementioned circumstances favorable to the Defendant.

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.