logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.10.04 2019고정1701
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On May 30, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for three years and six months with labor for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 21, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a non-permanent person.

On December 24, 2018, the criminal defendant against the victim B made a false statement to the victim B, who visited the Internet EF car page by accessing the cell phone from the house (Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Building D) to the Internet EF car page, and reported the false statement to the victim B, who called "to send the price for the goods if it is sent."

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to send perjury to the victim even if he receives the price for the goods from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 158,000 won from the victim via the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number: H) in the name of G for the purchase of goods.

B. On February 1, 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim I expressed a false statement to the victim I who contacted the victim I by accessing the Internet K Kack page located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 1, 2019, stating that “I will send a new World Goods Certificate if you send the price of the goods.”

However, as the defendant does not have merchandise coupons, he did not have an intention or ability to send merchandise coupons to the victim even if he receives the price of goods from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 270,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of G (Account No.N in the facts charged, but according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it appears to be “M” as an obvious clerical error (see, e.g., evidence records 59 pages).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B and I’s respective statements (including each accompanying document) 1.

arrow