logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.05.22 2014고단638
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant lends money from C, he listens to the statement that he will pay interest 10 copies per month. The fact is that the Defendant borrowed money from the victims because the Defendant did not have any particular property or income to be a living security recipient, and borrowed money from the victims to the above C, etc., and there is no intent or ability to repay the principal when the Defendant could not recover the principal. In order to obtain profits from high interest rate interest, the Defendant saw the victims to have borrowed the borrowed principal and the interest 5 parts per month as if he would have repaid the borrowed principal and the interest eth of the month without the mold.

On May 2, 2012, the Defendant displayed the cash in the amount of KRW 10 million, which was possessed by the victim D while playing so-called interest play as seen above at the Shyeong-dong, around May 2, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “A few million won is not money. There is a building in Busan and there are lots of land in the Republic of Korea. If the Defendant wishes to help to do so. If he/she loans money to do so, he/she will pay interest on the five-monthly interest every month and pay the principal if he/she talks only before a month. It is no concern that money will be recovered because he/she is constantly receiving authentication.”

However, as above, even if the Defendant did not have any property or income and borrowed money from D again to the above C, if it is difficult to recover the principal leased by the Defendant in order to receive high interest because it did not take any measures necessary to recover the credit, such as obtaining authentication or receiving security, etc., and even if D demands the repayment of principal, it did not have any intent or ability to repay the principal.

The Defendant, as above, deceiving D and received KRW 10 million from D as a loan from D, that is, from D, to June 26, 2013, and deceiving victims in the same manner as is stated in the separate crime list between around that time and around June 26, 2013, and deceiving them.

arrow