Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 500,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, on June 2008, recommended the victim D to purchase a share equivalent to 1/3 of the amount of KRW 250 million out of the 60,743m2 in the Docheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do, the Government Dong-dong, the Seocho-si, the Seocho-si, the Seocho-si, the Government of the Republic of Korea on June 2008, and made the victim enter into a sales contract with the content of the above provision, and had the victim enter into the sales contract.

6.9.To require the victim to pay KRW 200 million to E on or around September, the same year.

6. Around 28.28. Around the same day, the victim was transferred to the account in the name of husband of the Defendant A, and the victim was transferred KRW 50 million from the victim to the account in the name of husband of the Defendant A, as if the victim were to deliver the remainder of the purchase price of KRW 50

However, in fact, the Defendants were received from the victim from the beginning and thought that they would arbitrarily use KRW 50 million, and there was no intention or ability to deliver it to E in the purchase price.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired, as seen above, to deceiving the victim and to acquire 50 million won from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Statement made by witnesses E in the fifth trial records;

1. A copy of a real estate sales contract, a copy of each receipt, and a copy of a loan certificate [the defendants and defense counsel shall use the amount of KRW 50 million that the defendants received from the victim as the cost of road construction and the case cost, so there was no deception by the victim, and there was no criminal intent by fraud. We examine the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of the judgment. In other words, E consistently states that the police and this court did not state that it would pay KRW 50 million to GIST the victim the cost of opening the access road of the land of this case and the cost of opening the access road of this case (the defendants stated that the defendant would pay KRW 50 million to GIST as the cost of opening access road of this case and the case cost).