The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant had not invaded the central line at the time of the instant traffic accident.

2. The lower court duly adopted and recognized the following circumstances: ① on February 12, 2013, the Defendant was driving his own ice car at the point of view of: (a) around 13:20, the Defendant: (b) at the point of view of the instant traffic accident; (c) at the point of view of the road traffic accident, the Defendant was driving on the front side of the ice Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine; and (d) at the point of view of the vehicle, the vehicle was driving on the front side of the driver’s seat at the time, and the front side of the E driver’s seat at the time of the instant accident; and (d) at the point of view of the traffic accident, the vehicle was destroyed by the front side of the vehicle at the time of the instant accident; and (d) at the point of view that the vehicle was destroyed by the front side of the vehicle at the time of the instant accident, the vehicle was stopped by the Defendant’s front side of the vehicle at the time of the traffic accident at issue.