logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.24 2019고단489
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A is a person who, from April 7, 2018, has installed 25 guest rooms in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, and operates commercial sex acts, and Defendant B is a person who has worked as the head of the above business establishment from June 7, 2018.

From April 2018 to August 27, 2018, the Defendants received 80,000 won from many unspecified male customers who find out such places from the above “GMoel,” and provided guidance to the relevant guest room as the price for sexual traffic, and then had H, I, and J, etc., an employee of sexual traffic, who is an employee of sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against H, I, K, L, and J;

1. Seven copies of a police investigation report (Attachment of a on-site photograph) and a control site photograph;

1. One (No. 6), one (No. 50,00 won note 50,00 won note 18 (No. 1), 12 (No. 2), six (No. 3), one (No. 4), one (No. 5), one business registration certificate, one (No. 5), one (No. g. g. lusium jusium jusium jusium 3 (C, SHV-E210, S/ND) (No. 6), one (No. 7) (No. g., E, SM-G95N, S/NF);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of deposit transactions;

1. The Defendants: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as “contributive circumstances”)

1. Confiscation;

(a) Defendant A: The former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

B. Defendant B: The prosecutor, under the former part of Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, tried to confiscate one copy of the seized business registration certificate (No. 5).

However, there are circumstances to deem that the above confiscated articles either were or were to be provided for the criminal act of this case or those produced by or acquired by the criminal act of this case.

arrow