The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The statements by the victim of the summary of the grounds for appeal do not lack credibility due to lack of consistency, and no other evidence exists to prove the facts charged, the lower court erred by misapprehending facts and by misapprehending the legal principles accordingly.

2. Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim was suffering from the investigative agency to the court below, with fluoring fluoring fluoring in his short fluoring type, and the defendant was her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part, since the her her her her her her

The statements are consistently made.

The victim stated, after the Defendant’s indecent act, that he committed the indecent act against M, who is an employee of the same fee, and that the victim was erroneous that the victim was aware of the fact that he was the only part of the indecent act.

There is no reason to see, and there is no reason to see the defendant.

Although the indecent act by the defendant does not clearly appear, the CCTV images inside the D main point are also consistent with the victim's statement about the circumstances.

Therefore, since the credibility of the victim's statement can be recognized, the defendant committed an indecent act by force by deceiving the victim's her tum.

It can be sufficiently recognized and the judgment of the court below contains a mistake of facts or an error of law by misunderstanding legal principles.

As such, the defendant's assertion cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.