Defendant

The imprisonment with prison labor for A shall be ten months, and the imprisonment with prison labor for Defendant B shall be eight months, respectively.

(b).

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, while operating the “E” list in the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District, had been suffering from the victim F(373) and the victim G(37 years old) with the same list, on the ground that it was difficult for the victims to carry out a string business by reducing these employees.

At around 20:20 on November 2, 2016, the Defendants conspired with H, a staff member of the same head of H, sent the victims to the J restaurant in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and then Defendant A 5-6 times to drink the victim F’s face, and Defendant A 3-4 times to 3-4 times to 5-6 times to drinks, a dangerous object prepared in advance, with a pipe (97cm in length). The Defendants sent the back pipe to G, who was on the part of the victim of Lone Starex, and 5-6 times to drinking face.

Defendant

B 5-6 times of the victim F face in drinking, knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-ket

In collusion with H, the Defendants committed the bodily injury of the victim F by carrying dangerous objects, such as tearing, tearing, and leaving the right winding, and tearing, etc., respectively. The Defendants committed the bodily injury of the victim G, such as tearing, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement of each police statement with respect to G and F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning images of each photograph and CCTV screen images;

1. Articles 258-2(1), 257(1), and 30 of the Criminal Act on the Defendants of the pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of small amount of punishment (the Defendants reflect the Defendants, the victims’ intention not to punish the victims, and the Defendant A have the same record as exceeding the fine.