Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2016, the Defendant pointed out that he was able to carry his hand on a cleaning agent in front of the entrance of the D, which is located in the Heung-gu, Young-si, G, G, without being arranged to the victim E ( South Korea, 26 years of age). However, on the ground that the victim resisted against the victim, the victim’s face part is 1 time as drinking, followed by moving the victim’s face part into a bee, and followed by moving the victim’s back to the bee in the vicinity, and then the Defendant took the victim’s back the back water part of the victim’s back to the floor.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the so-called thring, the left-hand eye, the string of snow, the string of string, and the blood transfusion, etc., which require treatment for 29 days.

Finally, the changed facts charged include the part that "the defendant was able to take advantage of the victim's neck." However, according to the victim E's legal statement, according to the victim E's legal statement, the defendant seems not to have any direct relation to the crime of injury in this case. Thus, this part is deleted ex officio from the facts charged, and in light of the record, it is deemed that there is no hindrance to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense and basic facts are appropriately corrected and recognized within the same scope.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H in each part;

1. An investigation report (an investigation into the submission of data after completing medical records of a victim's hospital, hospital, or medical treatment and capturing letters);

1. Recording records;

1. Each injury diagnosis document (E) which can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① the victim has made a relatively consistent and concrete statement as to the fact that “the defendant was at the entrance of the company at the time of drinking, and when the defendant was at the time of drinking, and was at the time of drinking,” from the investigative agency to this court, and ② the victim’s face part at the time.