logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.07.05 2018노940
모욕
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles) is nothing more than a mere fact that the Defendant made the victim’s anthromatic attitude, but did not make the victim feel insultingly.

2. The offense of insult is established when a person openly insults another person (Article 311 of the Criminal Act). It is a legal interest to protect the external reputation meaning a social evaluation of the value of a person. Here, the offense of insult means the expression of an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that could undermine the social evaluation of a person without a statement of fact (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 87Do739, May 12, 1987; 2003Do3972, Nov. 28, 2003). Moreover, the offense of insult is established by openly expressing an abstract judgment or sacrific sentiment that could compromise the external reputation of the victim, or by openly expressing a victim’s external reputation, and it is not necessary that the victim’s external reputation should be infringed or that there is a risk of infringement upon the victim’s specific and real reputation after the victim’s appearance in Seoul-do (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2016Do9674, Oct. 13, 2016).

생각하여 다시 택시에서 내려 피해자 운행 택시의 번호판을 촬영하면서 “ 너는 좆됐다 ”라고 말하였고, 피고인 역시 위와 같이 말한 사실은 인정하고 있는 점( 공판기록 제 29 쪽, 증거기록 제 23 내지 25 쪽), 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게 피고인이 위와 같은 욕설 이외에도 10 분간에 걸쳐 큰 소리로 “ 씨 발 놈 아, 너 같은 새끼는 사라져 버려야...

arrow