1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 60,000,000 and its KRW 50,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 10,000,000 from July 23, 2015.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

(a) In the absence of dispute between the parties to the facts of recognition, or in full view of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap or Eul evidence Nos. 2, 3, 4 (including paper numbers), 7, 8, 9, Eul evidence No. 11-1, and Eul evidence No. 15, the following facts may be recognized, and no other counter-proof may be otherwise asserted:

1) The Defendant is a company with the objective of theme park operation consulting, real estate leasing business, etc., and C is a company and the actual manager of D and the Defendant for children’s play franchise, etc., on June 27, 2011, which is 2,563.22 square meters (hereinafter “instant commercial building”).

(2) On August 20, 2011, C concluded a lease agreement with the lessor, Quaker, Inc., and operated a store and franchise business with respect to commercial buildings. (3) On August 20, 201, C recommended the Plaintiff to enter into a lease agreement and a "G agency contract with D and D, which he/she manages, by making use of Laria character F and open to the public around December 2011. It plans to build and lease a store with the trade name of "G," which is operated by franchise in the food and beverage space next thereto. However, the lease of the store would provide education on the method of Me new cooking, as well as actively supporting the sales activities of agency goods by using the experience and technology of the head office, such as the supply of food materials, and know-how, and thereby soliciting the Plaintiff to enter into a lease agreement and a "G agency contract."

3) On the same day with C’s belief, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement and “G agency agreement” with respect to the “specialized store (B2 / FD1 room; hereinafter “instant store”) in the instant commercial building, respectively, with respect to KRW 50 million, monthly rent of KRW 3 million, and five years (from November 1, 2011 to October 31, 201) during the lease period. (4) After entering into a lease agreement and agency agreement, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement and agency agreement with the Defendant collectively as the name of store rental deposit and franchise store opening, franchise deposit, franchise deposit, and franchise.