logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.29 2018노2756
사기방조
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. As a result of the instant crime, the amount acquired by the Bosing staff for the instant crime was about KRW 48.6 million, and the Defendant still did not recover from damage even in his name, and the Defendant had the same criminal record.

The so-called “wishing” crime, such as the instant crime, is committed in a systematic, planned, and intelligent manner, and is highly harmful to society, and as it is difficult to arrest the entire organization, it is necessary to severely punish even if only part of the crime is involved.

This is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, the defendant shows the form of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case.

The defendant took part in the crime of this case as the so-called “transfer liability” and the degree of his participation is relatively heavy.

On the other hand, the defendant seems to have caused negligence to commit the crime of this case, and the number of people after the crime was considered.

This is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

In full view of such circumstances and circumstances as the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, motive of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, equality in punishment, etc., it is determined that the sentence of the court below is somewhat unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is with merit.

[Discied reasoning of the judgment below] Criminal facts and summary of evidence recognized by the court is identical to the facts constituting the crime and summary of evidence, and thus, the summary of evidence is identical to each corresponding column of the judgment below. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 369 of

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 347(1) and Article 32(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment.

arrow