The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the penalty of the original judgment (2.5 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to be inappropriate in light of the following factors: the defendant's intention to commit a crime is against the mistake while committing a crime; the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; and the defendant's vehicle is subscribed to the Financial Cooperative; however, despite the fact that the defendant's failure to perform his/her duty by driving a vehicle in violation of the signal as a taxi driver is not less complicated; the victim's injury is relatively heavy; and the defendant's efforts to recover damage are not sufficiently agreed with the victim; and the defendant's efforts to recover damage is not sufficient; and the defendant's age, character, character, occupation and environment, circumstances and result of the crime; and the various sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, such as the defendant's circumstances after committing a crime,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.