Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following order of payment shall be revoked, and
Reasons
. 60km per hour;
B) At the time of the instant accident, the mail office located around approximately 149 meters from the location of the accident (hereinafter “mail office”) is deemed to be the mail office located at the time of the instant accident.
(C) On the front road, the Defendant’s insured vehicle immediately before the instant accident stopped approximately 50% of the two-lanes away from the jurisdiction of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Office Building in the mountain basin. The Defendant’s insured vehicle immediately before the instant accident was parked in the front road. The Defendant’s insured vehicle proceeded along one lane between the two-lanes from the point where the entire railway route came to the ground and going to the opposite mountain basin. The Plaintiff’s insured vehicle was proceeding from the rear bank to the opposite mountain basin from the boundary of the office building of Yeongdeungpo-gu to the opposite mountain basin. (d) The Defendant’s insured vehicle from the after the said internship to the after the instant accident occurred, and each vehicle’s speed, defense angle, etc. based on the digital recorded data on the digital records of the operation of the Plaintiff vehicle are as follows: * the Defendant’s personal taxi, the Defendant’s insured taxi, and the Plaintiff’s front defense direction from the point of the instant accident to the left side of the road in the direction of each of the instant accident.
F) The Defendant’s Insured Vehicle Nos. 09:18:54 (Blue Park & Park, hereinafter the same shall apply)
The mail office, where a white car is parked at the No. 5 point of the above list, passes through one lane in front of the postal office where a white car is parked, and attempt to change the course from the point of the accident of this case to the two lanes at 09:19:04 (No. 15 point) and returned to the first lane immediately after discovering the Plaintiff vehicle and immediately returning to the first lane. (g) The Plaintiff’s vehicle, when proceeding to the 32 degree direction of the defense angle from 09:18:51 (No. 2 point in order), was moving to the 31 degrees between the second two seconds, 30 degrees between the second two seconds, 30 degrees between the second two seconds, and 32 degrees between the second two seconds, after changing the direction of progress from each direction to the 09:18:58 (No. 9 point).