logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.08.11 2014고정75
장물보관등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who serves as a salesperson at the Lee Jong-young Office of Company B.

1. At around 18:00 on September 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained a female from D before a YY store store located in the Gyeonggi-si E-si, Gyeonggi-do; and (b) received a request from the victim E to dispose of the victim’s market value, which is the victim’s possession, instead of return to the victim E; and (c) received a request for disposal request instead of one unit of gallonular phone, and knowingly received the request, the Defendant, despite being aware that the aforementioned mobile phone is a stolen, kept it for the purpose of selling it in selling it to the employees

2. Larceny;

A. From September 13, 2012, around September 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime, around 15:00 on September 13, 2012, 200, committed a theft of two LTE mobile phones in the total market value of the victim’s ownership, which was kept in the store storage in the above store, from the window stores operated by the victim F in the Gyeonggi-si E-si E-si.C.

B. On September 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed the crime of September 19, 2012, which was kept in the same place as the preceding paragraph on September 20, 2012; (b) committed the theft of two LTE mobile phones in approximately KRW 2 million in total at the market price owned by the victim, which was kept in the same place as the preceding paragraph.

C. On September 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed a crime around September 20, 2012, on or around September 20, 2012, committed a theft of approximately KRW 4 million in total of the market prices owned by the victim, which were kept in the same place as the preceding paragraph; and (b) gallon 2 LTE cell phone, which was destroyed by gallon jus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of F, G, D, and E;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written confirmation of subscription;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 362(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of acquiring stolens), Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of larceny), and selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow