Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a part-time worker. A.

On June 19, 2014, the National Democratic Labor first-class Federation of Korea held the second City conference and the second City conference claiming fact-finding in B from the Cheong River square to 20:00 on June 28, 2014, under the participation of about 10,000 members of its organizations, citizens, etc., and held two lanes in the direction of progress from June 28, 2014 to the Cheong River square, namely, the fact-finding in B, and the reason for privatization, etc.

On June 28, 2014, around 17:10, organizations such as the National Democratic Labor Labour Federation, the National Farm Association, the National Public Officials' Union, etc. participated in the second national conference, and the participants increased to approximately 4,000 persons, which began to take place at around 17:40, and approximately 3,000 persons began to take place around 17:40.

At around 18:10, the Defendant, as above, was present at the meeting of the second national conference, and around 3,00 the following about 18:10 p.m., occupied 8 lanes as a end-line, and proposed relief, such as “C retirement and medical and civil motion pictures,” and made it impossible for the Defendant to communicate all the directions of the closed distance for 50 minutes until 19:0.

Accordingly, the defendant conspiredd with approximately 3,00 participants in the assembly and interfered with the traffic of the land for 50 minutes.

B. The Defendant, in violation of the Assembly and Demonstration Act, did not immediately dissolve despite the receipt of the first dispersion order at around 18:27, the first dispersion order at around 18:30, the second dispersion order at around 18:37, and the third dispersion order at around 18:37, and the third dispersion order at around 18:37, on the ground that the Defendant’s act clearly deviates from the scope of the original report, such as the purpose, date, time, place, method, etc., and thus, cannot maintain order due to such act.

Accordingly, the defendant refused to comply with the police's dispersion order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police with D 1.