Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and the victim D(20 years) (Defendant A) are middle school and high school students.

On June 9, 2017, the Defendant sent the Defendant a mobile phone text message on the second floor of “F” located in E at opticalyang-si around 02:20 on June 9, 2017, which read, “I will not only be sentenced to imprisonment even if the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment,” and “I would like to be able to kill the victim clearly.” On the other hand, the Defendant got off the cell phone text message, “I would like to find out the victim’s left part of the victim’s play and back part, which is a dangerous object, respectively.

As a result, the defendant put the victim into a multi-lock open room for the victim to the left-hand side in need of treatment between approximately 21 days.

"2017 Highest 1389"

1. Defendant B: (a) around 02:05 on July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (b) did not go to G, which is a social line of the Plaintiff, which was a member of the society where the said G was engaged in a personal-type game in light of 02:05, and (c) carried out the said G by hand; (d) the victim A (20 years old) who was a part of the society where the said G did not answer; (e) was tightly flaged; and (e) was flaged by the victim’s flag; (e) was flaging the victim’s flab; and (e) was flad by drinking flabing the face of the victim’s flab; and (e) had the victim go beyond the flabed part of the de

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

2. Defendant A, at the time, at the time, and at the place described in paragraph 1, the victim B (20 years of age), who was a part of society, was satisfying the above G, which was satisfying, was satisfying the victim’s face, satisfying the victim’s face, and satisfying the victim’s face going beyond satisfy to the victim several times.

Accordingly, the defendant injured the victim.

On July 14, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 1738, the Defendant, at around 01:59 on July 14, 2017, raised a dispute as a trial expense on the ground that the Defendant, approximately one hour before around 1 hour in front of the studio in the “I” room room located in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si, a woman under the Victim J (22).