The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below not only has the record of being punished several times for the same crime, but also has been placed under the priority of probation for drinking driving in 2008, and committed another crime in this case during the grace period without being aware of the fact that the defendant was placed under the priority of probation once again in 2013. The sentence of the court below is determined by discretionary mitigation of imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. In light of the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime in this case, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment cannot be deemed unfair even if the defendant reflects the situation that the defendant was under the priority of probation.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.