logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.27 2017구합1850
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

(a) Plaintiff’s entry into the Republic of Korea and refugee recognition - Plaintiff’s nationality: Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as “Pakististan”), - Status of entry and status of stay on October 29, 201, and short-term (C-2) status of stay (the expiration date of stay: February 26, 201) (the expiration date of stay) on January 27, 2011, and a disposition not to permit extension of sojourn period on November 6, 2012 (the expiration date of departure: December 1, 2012) and granting other status of stay (G-1) (the expiration date of stay): - Application for refugee recognition on June 17, 2015) (the expiration date of stay due to an industrial accident on September 24, 2015).

The defendant's decision not to recognize refugee status (hereinafter referred to as "disposition of this case") - Grounds: No sufficient fear of persecution cannot be recognized.

C. On October 11, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on October 11, 2016, and then did not have any dispute over the ground for recognition of the fact that the Plaintiff currently continues to file an objection, and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the evidence No. 1, No.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion at night on August 9, 2012, the Plaintiff received a total amount from the persons presumed to be an armed organization of the time spawn in the street, and took the cell phone, cash, etc., and reported to the police on the following day, and the perpetrator arrested and went to the correctional institution.

However, when the plaintiff visited Pakistan on July 2015, the perpetrator was found in the absence of the plaintiff and his/her family members, and the neighbor was present to incidental gates and locks.

Therefore, if the plaintiff returned to Pakistan, it is likely that he would be stuffed by him.

(b) The definitions of terms used in this Act under relevant Acts and subordinate statutes shall be as follows:

1."Refugees" shall not be protected by the nationality State due to well-founded fears recognizing that he/she may be stuffed for reasons of race, religion, nationality, status as a member of a particular social group or political opinion.

arrow