Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

From January 2016 to July 11, 2016, the Defendant was a person who visited the victim D (7 years of age) and the victim E (10 years of age) and worked as a foreign teacher.

1. On July 12, 2016, the Defendant, in the victim D’s public book room located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, 101 Dong 805, on July 12, 2016, committed physical abuse that may inflict bodily harm on the victim’s body, such as making the victim’s 70 macks of gluor and gluor with the victim’s macks of 70 macks, on the ground that the victim did not take an out-of-the-counter mack.

2. On July 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) committed physical abuse that causes bodily harm to a child, such as causing the victim’s macker to 70 macks his mack, with the victim’s macker’s macks, on the ground that the victim’s macks the victim’s macks around 15:30 around 15:30; and (b) the victim’s macks the victim’s macks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Stenographic records;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of the victim’s body photo), investigation report (Attachment of the victim’s conversation between G andmar), investigation report (Attachment of the victim’s body photo), investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of the victim’s mother), investigation report (Hearing of the victim’s telephone statement);

1. The chief of the accusation (the defendant and his defense counsel differ from part of the criminal facts, such as recovery of victims when the defendant was employed, and there is possibility that the victim's act might be her her tumm due to other person's act, and the degree of the defendant's act was not abused to the extent that it does not harm the victim's physical health and development, and the defendant's act was conducted to the extent that the mother of the victims agreed in advance with the victim and constitutes a justifiable act that does not go against social norms. However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the defendant was against the victims.