(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.09.26 2013나11825

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.09.26 2013나11825

배당이의

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this court's explanation are as follows: "A.," and "B.," and "the defendant's contributions" of the 3rd and the 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: "A.," and "A.," and "the defendant's contributions" of the 16th and the 5th of the judgment of the court of first instance are as "A., Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd.; hereinafter the same shall apply; hereinafter., the 5th and 8th of the 5th are as follows." The 5th and 11th of the 5th and 12th of the 5th are as follows: "the second part of the purchase price and the transfer of the balance of the above purchase price are due prior to the due date of the payment." The plaintiff's new arguments are as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the following addition.

2. Determination on new arguments in the trial

A. The Defendant’s claim against the non-party company of this case is subject to five years’s extinctive prescription. The Defendant’s claim against the non-party company of this case was completed by exercising its final right due to the seizure and collection of the non-party company’s claim against the third party obligor, or its execution was revoked or revoked on December 2, 2009, five years from December 2, 2004.

Therefore, the Plaintiff asserts the extinctive prescription of the instant promissory note claim against the non-party company on behalf of the Defendant, on behalf of the non-party company as the creditor.

B. Determination 1: (a) No. 1; (b) No. 3-1, No. 2; and No. 1 and No. 2; and (c) the fact-finding results of the fact-finding on E.C. E. Round on February 28, 2013 by the court of the first instance; and (c) the results of the response of each order to submit financial transaction information to E.S. by the court of the first instance, the competent competent agricultural cooperative, the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, and the Korean Agricultural Cooperative Federation

① On May 30, 2003, Nonparty Company is the representative director E and par value of Nonparty Company.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.11.08 2018나2020598

-수원지방법원여주지원 2020.10.08 2020가단2672

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.08 2015가단5378581

-수원지방법원 2019.02.13 2018나67978

-대구지방법원 2018.08.16 2017나316407