1. On May 15, 2017, the Plaintiff’s delivery, installation, and cancellation of the system distribution and system vision against the Defendant.

1. As stated in the separate sheet for description of the claim and the written application for modification of the reasons for the claim

2. A judgment based on the presumption of confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul. 25, 1989) (the attorney of the defendant only submitted a formal reply seeking the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim, and resigned without any reply as to the facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of the claim. Since the defendant did not give any reply to the plaintiff's assertion, it is deemed that all the facts alleged by the plaintiff were led to confession (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 89Meu4045, Jul