Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment due to a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act by the Daegu District Court on January 14, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on January 22, 2011.
Since January 4, 2000, the Defendant engaged in wholesale and retail business of automobile parts with the trade name of "D" from Busan Metropolitan City.
1. On July 27, 2009, the Defendant entered “E”, “4”, and “130,045,449” in the trade name column of the list of the total tax invoice by seller by seller at the above D office, although the Defendant did not receive any goods or services from E, and submitted to the Government a false list of the total tax invoice by seller at the end of January 2009, stating “E”, “4” and “130,045,459” as stated in the list of the crimes in the attached list of the list of crimes.
2. Around July 27, 2009, the Defendant entered “(s) mine”, “3” and “45,544,544,” in the column of the trade name of the list of the total tax invoice by the buyer by buyer at the first time in 2009, although there was no fact that goods or services were supplied to the main owners at the above D office, and submitted to the Government, a false entry of the total tax invoice by buyer in the column of the list of the total tax invoice by buyer at the first time in 2009, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.
3. On January 25, 2010, the Defendant entered “E”, “6”, and “181,423,453” in the trade name column of the list of individual suppliers by seller at the above D office, although there was no fact that the Defendant received goods or services from E, on February 2009, and submitted to the Government a false list of total tax invoices by customer, as shown in the attached list of crimes, as if the Defendant received goods equivalent to the total value of KRW 501,869,298 from the transaction partners, such as the list of the annexed list of crimes.
4. The Defendant, around January 25, 2010, goods or services to (State) the facts at the above D office.