logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.26 2013가합91356
운송료
Text

1.(a)

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 61,862,028 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from January 10, 2013 to March 26, 2015.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running the maritime air freight forwarding business, and the Defendant is a company running the exhibition agreement agency business.

B. The Defendant, from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea, ordered services related to B events held in Saudi Arabia (from the duration of the event to D; hereinafter “instant event”) and entered into a marine transportation contract with the Plaintiff as of January 18, 201 with regard to the transportation of the goods for display, etc. used in the instant event (excluding value added tax) and the delivery date until January 18, 2012.

(hereinafter referred to as “contract of carriage 1”). C.

Since then, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to transport the exhibits, etc. to be transported by air (hereinafter “the second transport contract”), and the Plaintiff transported the exhibits, etc. requested by the Defendant in accordance with the transport contract Nos. 1 and 2 to Saudi Arabia in Korea.

On February 2012, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to re-transport the goods indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant goods”) used in the instant event (hereinafter “third transport contract”) to the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “instant goods”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff accepted the instant goods at D around the end of the instant exercise.

E. On July 20, 2012, the Plaintiff loaded the instant goods in Saudi Arabia, and the same year.

8. 16. The distribution of the instant goods arrived at the port of Busan in Korea.

F. On August 21, 2012, the Plaintiff paid a transportation charge, etc. under a transportation contract with the Defendant, and demanded the Defendant to accept the instant goods located in the Busan Port Area. However, the Defendant did not accept the instant goods, and the head of Busan Customs Office completed the storage period of the instant goods shipped into a bonded area on November 16, 2012. Thus, the Plaintiff did not take measures for customs clearance or return to a foreign country until then.

arrow