The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (definite or misunderstanding of legal principles) did not have entered the intersection through yellow signal, and even if the Defendant entered the intersection in contravention of yellow signal, the signal immediately before the intersection is changed, so the Defendant cannot expect that he would stop at a considerable speed, and thus, the judgment of the court below convicting the Defendant of the facts charged in this case is erroneous by misapprehending the legal principles or misapprehending the legal principles.

2. In the case of paragraph (2) of Article 5 of the Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, attached Table 3, 1. Vehicles and horses shall make a yellow light; 1. Vehicles and horses shall, when there is a stop line or crosswalk, immediately stop immediately before or after the intersection; and when there are already entered the intersection, immediately stop out of the intersection;

2. Vehicles and horses may make a bypass and in case of a bypassing, they shall not obstruct the crossing of pedestrians;

The phrase "the vehicle" is defined as "in case that the vehicle has been changed to a yellow light before entering the intersection, the vehicle must be stopped immediately before the stop line or the intersection, and it cannot be said that the driver can choose whether to stop or proceed with the vehicle.

(대법원 2006. 7. 27. 선고 2006도3657 판결 참조). 또한, 신호등에 의하여 교통정리가 행하여지고 있는 “ㅏ”자형 삼거리의 교차로를 녹색등화에 따라 직진하는 차량의 운전자는 반대방향에서 오는 차량이 이미 신호에 위반한 채 좌회전하여 비정상적인 운행을 하고 있음을 목격한 경우에는 자기의 진행전방에 돌입할 가능성을 예견하여 그 차량의 동태를 주의 깊게 살피면서 속도를 줄여 주행하는 등 적절한 조치를 취함으로써 사고발생을 미리 방지할 업무상 주의의무가 있다

Supreme Court Decision 85Do2651 Decided February 25, 1986, Supreme Court Decision 85Do2651 Decided February 25, 199