1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against Defendant K and L shall be revoked.

2. Attached Form A, Defendant K, and L on September 22, 2015.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, judicial precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, and judgment on issues, etc.) is sufficiently reasonable as a result of the judgment of the court of first instance on the basis of the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court before the citing the judgment of the court of first instance based on the litigation materials and arguments.

The reasoning for this Court concerning this case is as follows, and the part concerning the Plaintiff’s claim as to Defendant K and L, as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and the part concerning the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except for the part concerning the Plaintiff’s claim as to the remaining grounds for appeal as set forth in paragraph (3) and additional determination as to the matters alleged by Defendant H as the grounds for appeal as set forth in paragraph (4) below, and thus, it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the first instance judgment. As such, this Court

2. (a) No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "M Co., Ltd." shall be charged to "M Co., Ltd.", and all of the following "M" shall be charged to "M Co., Ltd." in the judgment of the court of first instance.

(b) If the first instance court’s judgment No. 6, 17, “M” is deleted.

(c) No. 1 of the judgment of the first instance is written by inserting the “Total KRW 4,833,551,282” in the table No. 10 of the judgment of the first instance with “Total KRW 4,835,51,282.”

(d) No. 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “345,00 won” shall be read as “345,00,000 won”. (e) On the 11th judgment of the court of first instance, the term “all apartments listed in No. 1) No. 9 of the judgment of first instance (the whole apartments listed in No. 4 of the above table 1)” shall be read as “(the whole apartments listed in No. 4 of the above table 1)”.

(f) No. 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “460,272,777 won” was 460,273,777 won.

(g) No. 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance, No. 3 of the 15th judgment, "b." was applied to "in time".

(h) No. 16 of the first instance judgment No. 18 of the first instance judgment "No. 485,686 Won 485,686" shall be applied to "No. 485,685 Won."

(i) No. 28 of the first instance judgment No. 5, “Defendant A’s active property at the time of the instant six sales contract,” which was based on the Plaintiff’s assertion at the time of the instant six sales contract.