beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant C for four months, and Defendant D for a fine of KRW 3,00,000, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On August 9, 2017, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months at the Gwangju District Court on the charge of forging Private Document, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 23, 2017.
【Criminal Facts】
1. Although Defendant A, B, and C’s co-defendants fall from the cargo vehicle and the damaged part of the cargo vehicle is minor, the Defendants conspired to receive insurance proceeds by submitting a false damage evaluation report as if the said compact is reproduced, and as if it is necessary to handle the total loss, to the victim G (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “victim”) who is a member insurance company of the said compact.
The Defendants: (a) around October 17, 2013, at the residence of Defendant C, located in Hap-gun, Hap-gun, Chungcheongnam, and (b) around October 17, 2013; (c) on October 16, 2013, there was no fact that Defendant C had observed the said accident without having been transferred to the said compacter; (d) as if the said compacter had observed I, Defendant B prepared a false written reply of the fact of the accident that he was transferred to the said compacter; (c) Defendant B had the said compacter as the J in charge of the payment of repair costs for the said compacter; (d) Defendant A had the said compacter in order to play the role of the agricultural machinery repair business; and (e) Defendant C prepared a false estimate of KRW 45,145,040,040 for repair costs, including replacement of the frame of the said compacter; and (e) submitted the said written report to the employees of the victim on November 20, 15, 20130.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim company to receive property.
2. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and B;
A. Despite the fact that the owner of J(R number M) is N, the Defendants prepared a false damage evaluation report by pretending to a substitute accident as if they were the compact owned D, and the said victim company, which is an insurance company of the said compact shall do so.